So we continue our rigurous journey toward reality, as we leave the feminist universe behind, (with a few less passengers, since every enterprise is challenging and hard to follow) to specify that female superior Man-oriented self-degradation has multiple
So we can conclude that feminism wants exactly the same thing that can be observed in other animal species' natural social groups: the inferior male specimens do all the hunting together, so the alpha male has enough time for fucking all the females and f
So should her former sexual partner count matter? We're bringing r/MD's principle on this again: to a superior man, the only thing she can do for her former sexual partner count to not matter is that she degrades herself for that new superior man more tha
Here we aren't interested in the false image of female superiority feminists brainwash inferior men about at feminist meetings to get money from those men. We're interested in the actual women, that go back home to a superior Man whose love they want to k
Another thing we owe to feminism is that women can enjoy sex as much as men, without shame. Here we have two feminists enjoying sex as much as a man, without shame. feminism has been like female intelligence coming out of its closet, and we males are impr
This inconvenient subreddit has allowed us to develop a conceptual framework within which we can now easily state that the female body's beauty does not lie in its curves, but in being the best thing the woman can offer from herself. female beauty and per
MD feminists, remember: consent is sexy, but since r/MD is more feminist than feminism we state that begging is even sexier. So don't say this isn't a feminist subreddit; we're the most feminist subreddit
So in the light of our previous considerations we can say that, in terms of giving an optimal sexual experience to a Man in order to get accepted by Him, if a woman's will and intention aren't being that of undergoing pain, degradation and own destruction
Whether women are inferior or not is not an absolute thing, but it depends on whether we compare women to superior men or inferior men. This is why women need feminism so they don't get treated as inferior by men that are inferior too
Within our concept frame, we can easily state that the basic gift female inferiority contributes superior men is a "differential gift", consisting in the simple female behavior of not getting angry when the superior man mistreats her, like she would get a
A superior man is the only happy goal of female inferiority in life. This fact is so essential, definitional and genetic to the inferior female nature that we can state that if all men were *EXACTLY* the same, withouth the slightest differences among them
So we can state that female inferiority is picky about men, so women's perfect utopia is that of being accepted for a relationship by the most superior man in the world; and male superiority isn't picky but promiscuous, and so its perfect utopia is a hare
So maybe we could somewhat state that Hillary is the first feminist to learn that thanks to the technology of information hypergamy is starting to become a non-working method for feminists to achieve their goals. Technology (male technology) is good
Because we shouldn't omit that the country granting the immense majority of the Nobel prizes important in sciences to men is the most feminist country in the world
