she has the freedom to be objectified. feminism criticizes objectification, but it should criticize only the fact of a woman being objectified *against her free will*; i.e. feminism should only criticize the act of not respecting female free will. Another
prostitution is female's oldest job, fully Patriarchal and a culmination of sexism, since women are treated like simple inferior fuckmeat; and feminism wants to support this use of female freedom against feminism, protect it, and upgrade it to a GDP compl
So the justifying basis of the money, the quotas and the status of superiority women demand from inferior men, is the female inferiority women submit and pay to superior Men. inferior men pay the whores to superior Men; this is feminism
Artificial gender equality defenders have learned that the superior Men they need and prefer don't like and don't accept feminism. This hasn't made them reject feminism, but it has made them use the principles of feminism against inferior men, which is a
feminism is not against objectification; feminism is only against inferior men. Which is logical: feminism can't criticize the superiority of a Man who is actually superior.
After years of struggle and activism, feminism has definitely managed to make Men more respectful toward women: in the present, Men agree to privilege women with the infinite honor of Male pee. So we must acknowledge feminism's achievements
feminism wants the money from inferior men and the semen from superior Men. It requests government's egalitarian policies for the same reasons of justice disabled people do. feminism is the female hypergamy's struggle against inferior men
Another thing we owe to feminism is that women can enjoy sex as much as men, without shame. Here we have two feminists enjoying sex as much as a man, without shame. feminism has been like female intelligence coming out of its closet, and we males are impr
Real feminists prefer superior males; so real feminism acknowledges and professes the feminine quality of inferiority and submission. Unreal feminism prefers inferior males.
Now that feminism is another oppressive system, can you guess what will be the first concealed but fundamental rule of this oppressive feminism? Exactly: all women are under the obligation to prefer and choose superior Men. Which is one of those freedom i
feminism tells women to disregard their inferiority that defines femininity in terms of their sexual complementarity with superior Men, but feminism keeps to itself women should deny their inferiority to inferior men. feminism's euphemism for this is "wom
feminism has managed to break the chains of Male oppression. Now it needs to free women from the chains of women's inferiority's oppression; but, oh, it can only achieve it by oppressing women into quotas, artificial helping policies and female superiorit
So there are two kinds of toiletification: unwilling toiletification, which is a bad one and is the one being fought by feminism; and self-toiletification, wich is female-freedom based and so it's good and defended by feminism, and it's used by female inf
feminism: a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending that Men should share a part of their superiority with women so both genders become equal.
women are inferior & worthless, but since female inferiority logically pursues superior Men, women don't depend on inferior men, and this is why women aren't inferior or worthless to inferior men. women have built a whole feminism out of this hypergam
So, MD feminists, this subreddit doesn't make you reject feminism, but, on the contrary, it teaches you that you *NEED* feminism (namely artificial gender equality) because of your very female inferiority. This is the most feminist subreddit out there
What's a greater act of freedom and of feminism than being non-feminist, dropping gender equality and submitting to Male supremacy? But r/MD has saved feminism from this lethal question by clarifying that feminists need the freedom of choice to choose sup
Freedom is very important to feminism. It's freedom, not gender equality, that becomes the core of feminism when it doesn't come to inferior men. Here u have a feminist that uses her freedom a lot, so I'm sure feminism would love her for its next women's
When it comes 2 inferior men, feminism's core definition logically is gender equality (u can't call an inferior man a superior man). When it comes 2 superior men, feminism's core definit. is freedom of choice, comprising abilities such as choosing & s
feminism isn't properly true or false. feminism is just a set of methodological principles around two cores: the core of 'gender equality' relates to (fighting) methods against inferior men, and the core of 'freedom of choice' relates to (submissive) meth
feminism is women's way of hating the men women hate: inferior men. Complementarily, non-feminism is women's way of loving the superior men female inferiority needs, prefers and loves
So /r/maledom has helped modern feminists get a better, clearer understanding of what feminists' place is and of what feminism's place is: above inferior men, below superior men
feminism isn't a negation that women r inferior, but that women r inferior 2 men who r inferior too; which is consistent with female inferiority's preference 4 superior men. This is y feminism is a claim that inferior men r worthless trash, the way of avo
So women don't want to be appreciated by unimportant insignificant inferior men or for all those inner virtues and qualities the RPG of feminism brainwashes inferior men into. women want to be appreciated by important superior men and for the things super
This subreddit has stated many times that feminism isn't a women's movement of hate for men, but a women's movement of hate for inferior men. Here you have a feminist begging and loving to be hated by the superior man her inferiority loves
feminism has brainwashed inferior men into the idea that women are superior people oppressed and disempowered into a fictitious role of female inferiority by the Patriarchy. This subreddit has shown women are inferior people empowered to a fictitious role
Inferior men see women as superior people (inferior men's feminism is a feature inbuilt within inferior men's inferior genes); superior men see women as inferior people (inbuilt feature); female inferiority simply maximizes its benefits out of it all
So women's necessity of being treated respectfully and like presidents by inferior men (that is, feminism) is logical to female inferiority's necessity of being accepted as inferior and in its inferiority by the superior men that are that female inferiori
In poor countries women are mistreated against their will. In First World's countries of wealth, of professional opportunities, of freedom and of feminism women are smarter and they beg to be mistreated, but only to superior men
women's life passes off between 2 goals: 1)Getting their inferiority accepted by superior men (freedom of choice feminism); 2)Denying their inferiority to inferior men (gender equality feminism). Affirmative action, female presidencies... r just forms of
After all, feminists sometimes say feminism is about the ability to choose, and what could be a greater exercise of the freedom of choice than freely choosing to shit on feminism and submit to the Patriarchy's oppression?
In other words: feminists want to be treated like shit by the top 1% of men, and like presidents by the bottom 99% of men. This is why feminists will vote for a president to the wife of a former male president, as the pinnacle of feminism, knowing they ca
If female inferiority's hypergamy can b defined as female inferiority's preference 4 superior men, it can b defined too as fem. inferiority's hatred 4 inferior men, i.e, feminism. So feminism is the institutionalization of female hypergamy, so its logical
