feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
Artificial gender equality defenders have learned that the superior Men they need and prefer don't like and don't accept feminism. This hasn't made them reject feminism, but it has made them use the principles of feminism against inferior men, which is a
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
feminism, gender equality civility and superiority over inferior men are the role play; female inferiority and submission to superior Men are the natural, reality play
Sometimes feminists say feminism is about gender right equality. Some other times they say it's about freedom of choice. So no surprise they never say it's about intelligence
women like being natural, so superior Men treat them like the inferior fuck-meat they naturally are. women only like being artificial when they demand artificial gender equality to inferior men
Another hypergamous artificial gender equality defender proving her superior Man she wants His happiness and well-being too, by way of own pain. It's what typically happens when she can't get the important things she gets from Him on her own and without H
Another trashy slut who thinks helping run feminism is running her own liberated freedom regardless of what to apply her freedom to. That's how she proves her superior wisdom. So yeah, gender equality is women are as free and right holding as men. Wisdom
feminism is a fantasy used to establish an artificial and political gender equality, so it only applies in the government policies, in companies and businesses, and in the streets. No point in creating feminism as something to be applied in the sheets
feminism: a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending that Men should share a part of their superiority with women so both genders become equal.
MD gender equality defenders: if you prefer Superior Men and you want to be accepted by a Superior Man, there are certain assumptions you have to agree on about your female definition and there are certain conditions you have to fulfill.
feminists say feminism is about gender right equality. This means women should have the right to submit like the real fuckmeat they biologically are to real, superior Men plus the right to get money from inferior men via quotas and other non-guilty female
So, MD feminists, this subreddit doesn't make you reject feminism, but, on the contrary, it teaches you that you *NEED* feminism (namely artificial gender equality) because of your very female inferiority. This is the most feminist subreddit out there
Artificial gender equality defenders' preference for superior Men is simply based on female inferiority. Superior people don't need to beg other people for things they can achieve on their own. women would not pay their curves if they could achieve the th
So yes, the choosing of a superior Man is the universal ace every artificial gender equality defender has up her sleeve for when she's required to actually prove her superior capabilities and she can't do anything but admit she's just a cum dump
What's a greater act of freedom and of feminism than being non-feminist, dropping gender equality and submitting to Male supremacy? But r/MD has saved feminism from this lethal question by clarifying that feminists need the freedom of choice to choose sup
So artificial gender equality defending feminists prefer superior Men because, due to female inferiority, this is the only thing women can do and contribute in order to be accepted by Men (whether superior or inferior men). An inferior being wouldn't try
Freedom is very important to feminism. It's freedom, not gender equality, that becomes the core of feminism when it doesn't come to inferior men. Here u have a feminist that uses her freedom a lot, so I'm sure feminism would love her for its next women's
When it comes 2 inferior men, feminism's core definition logically is gender equality (u can't call an inferior man a superior man). When it comes 2 superior men, feminism's core definit. is freedom of choice, comprising abilities such as choosing & s
So u've got the female brain saying feminism is on gender equality, then saying it's on freedom, without realizing freedom entails the ability 2 choose 2 drop gender equality... feminism itself is grounded in female inferior intelligence... then feminists
This feminist uses her freedom 4 discarding gender equality; but she'll say she's then discarding her own whole humanity too, so she's acting like an animal or an object, so gender equality can't get detached from humanity & becomes mandatory 2 humani
feminism isn't properly true or false. feminism is just a set of methodological principles around two cores: the core of 'gender equality' relates to (fighting) methods against inferior men, and the core of 'freedom of choice' relates to (submissive) meth
women's life passes off between 2 goals: 1)Getting their inferiority accepted by superior men (freedom of choice feminism); 2)Denying their inferiority to inferior men (gender equality feminism). Affirmative action, female presidencies... r just forms of
The Social Justice Warrior pleads and whimpering promises to abandon all her false beliefs about gender equality, if the excruciatingly painful caning of her rump will only end.
