she has the freedom to be objectified. feminism criticizes objectification, but it should criticize only the fact of a woman being objectified *against her free will*; i.e. feminism should only criticize the act of not respecting female free will. Another
After a heavy feminist reprogramming the internet revealed her feminism only applies to inferior men, and it is being reprogrammed as an inferior worthless honorless piece of fuck-meat that leads to being accepted by Superior Men. After this new brainwash
So would you like to know how could you get feminists shutting down feminism in less than two years? Because that's what you're going to have once you manage to make womyn fully understand that being a complete, consummate feminist entails dropping Superi
So we can conclude that feminism wants exactly the same thing that can be observed in other animal species' natural social groups: the inferior male specimens do all the hunting together, so the alpha male has enough time for fucking all the females and f
A succesful, choosing guy is not a guy who has sex with them because he was a nice guy, but a guy who has sex with them despite being a rude guy who knows no feminism. Here you have a paid example.
feminism mustn't be selective. feminism must support even anti-feminist women that freely and liberatedly choose to destroy feminism and prefer Patriarchy and polygyny, so feminism must support its own destruction
Now that feminism is another oppressive system, can you guess what will be the first concealed but fundamental rule of this oppressive feminism? Exactly: all women are under the obligation to prefer and choose superior Men. Which is one of those freedom i
So the reason why women want to be treated like respectable superior people by inferior men via feminism isn't that women are superior, but that being treated like the inferior worthless dump meat women are is the only thing women can contribute superior
So there are two kinds of toiletification: unwilling toiletification, which is a bad one and is the one being fought by feminism; and self-toiletification, wich is female-freedom based and so it's good and defended by feminism, and it's used by female inf
feminism is a fantasy used to establish an artificial and political gender equality, so it only applies in the government policies, in companies and businesses, and in the streets. No point in creating feminism as something to be applied in the sheets
When Men treated women like inferior beings forcibly and against women's will, feminism was a demand for freedom and liberation. Now that women freely and liberatedly behave like inferior submissive beings, feminism says freedom is not an important thing.
What's a greater act of freedom and of feminism than being non-feminist, dropping gender equality and submitting to Male supremacy? But r/MD has saved feminism from this lethal question by clarifying that feminists need the freedom of choice to choose sup
Another rape-fighter being adorable. Rape-fighters don't fight rape; they fight lack of consent, namely, lack of freedom. "Lack of freedom" is feminism's euphemism for "inferior men"
When feminists say they're strong & independent they mean they're strong & independent enough for doing whatever they want, and what feminists want is not inferior men who believe in female superiority and feminism. Here u have a feminist being st
feminists are complaining about people not being feminist; they forgot a thing exists which they call 'freedom' that enables people not to be feminist, and so they want to oppress people into feminism. It's only freedom if it benefits them
So women's inferiority only has two interrelated, complementary goals in life: 1-Being mistreated by superior men; and 2-being given respect, social position, quotas, affirmative action, presidencies, money and feminism by inferior men
So since picking superior men is the best choice female inferiority can make, somehow we can see it and understand it as preference for superior men being the only "strength" and "independence" of female inferiority, which is why feminism demands respect
The Internet is helping feminists improve their skills at being accepted by the superior men their female inferiority needs to pick, but this is increasing inferior men's pressure on women as well, and this is why feminism needs to intensify its agenda ag
feminists only want to get mistreated by superior men, this is their only superior and happy goal in life; this is why they need to be treated nicely by inferior men and they want to receive feminism, quotas, presidencies and money from inferior men
So women don't want to be appreciated by unimportant insignificant inferior men or for all those inner virtues and qualities the RPG of feminism brainwashes inferior men into. women want to be appreciated by important superior men and for the things super
Political correctness doesn't mean women's right not to be treated like inferior people by inferior men women aren't inferior to can only translate into inferior men having to treat women like superior people, but feminism knows the inferior men's inferio
This subreddit has stated many times that feminism isn't a women's movement of hate for men, but a women's movement of hate for inferior men. Here you have a feminist begging and loving to be hated by the superior man her inferiority loves
So feminism just tries to make the society acknowledge the logical truth of the idea that women's right not to be treated like inferior people by men that are inferior too can't get obstructed by women's right to be treated like inferior people by superio
feminists love this subreddit bc thanks to it modern generation feminists have a clearer understanding about feminism being a defense means against inferior men and about feminism's compatibility with their female inferior biology's preference for superio
So women's necessity of being treated respectfully and like presidents by inferior men (that is, feminism) is logical to female inferiority's necessity of being accepted as inferior and in its inferiority by the superior men that are that female inferiori
In poor countries women are mistreated against their will. In First World's countries of wealth, of professional opportunities, of freedom and of feminism women are smarter and they beg to be mistreated, but only to superior men
Authentic superior men are minority. Democracy runs on majorities. Never underestimate the inferior female brain: it has been evolving hypergamy for 200,000 years, feminism being the ultimate stage of this evolution
Superior men's female inferior fuckmeat wants to be inferior men's president. After all, what on Earth could one ever expect from a movement, feminism, run by women?
After all, feminists sometimes say feminism is about the ability to choose, and what could be a greater exercise of the freedom of choice than freely choosing to shit on feminism and submit to the Patriarchy's oppression?
women want to be like worthless shit to superior men (so they get their female inferiority accepted by the best men). Then they want to be like presidents to inferior men because feminism (so they get their female inferiority paid with the best wages)
In other words: feminists want to be treated like shit by the top 1% of men, and like presidents by the bottom 99% of men. This is why feminists will vote for a president to the wife of a former male president, as the pinnacle of feminism, knowing they ca
The fact that female inferiority wants to be treated like shit by superior men makes inferior men believe they can treat women like shit too, but inferior men are inferior too and so they're shit too, which is why women need feminism against inferior men
