feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
MD feminists: a "feministjob" is sexier than a handjob. It's when you use a feminist instead of your hand. So you can use feminism for pleasing your superior man too, as well as for getting respect, social status, quotas, presidencies and money from infer
It looks like Reddit's owners are maneuvering so they can ban this subreddit (very possibly), so the fun might end soon. If they banned this subreddit, Reddit's owners would prove that managing the neutrality and the freedom they say they defend is too mu
So /r/maledom's feminists, you do it with your lips too; why wouldn't you paint your "other" lips? Just in order to emphasize your *real* and *most valuable* talents (those you keep and use to get to be accepted by the *best* men).
women are just inferior fuckmeat. It's great, if their own internal feelings about it are good. So women who are happy to be the simple fuckmeat want to be feminist, cause being inferior fuckmeat is important and superior too and so it's another proof of
This subreddit hasn't even begun its real journey yet; but as it starts to grow too big to some fellows, as redditors start to get this isn't "game Maledom" but SERIOUS Maledom, and as the subscriber count gets harder to increase, we get closer to the beg
Another hypergamous artificial gender equality defender proving her superior Man she wants His happiness and well-being too, by way of own pain. It's what typically happens when she can't get the important things she gets from Him on her own and without H
No matter what you say, two feminist holes will always be better than just one. As well as if the pleasure is greater for Him, then it is greater for them too.
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
Mom said she needed me to get the next size up in the shirt she was trying on. I asked why and she sent me this: "See? It's too small, I can't even get it all the way down!"
It has been a while since I posted. Here are some shots from above my bed. I had to make them B&W because my ass was too reflective, apparently I need more sun.
Wrote o[f]f my car a few days ago, and my codeine ran out this morning, new harvest was also ready today too, I've been waiting so long for this, came through right when I needed it [8]
Whether women are inferior or not is not an absolute thing, but it depends on whether we compare women to superior men or inferior men. This is why women need feminism so they don't get treated as inferior by men that are inferior too
MD feminists: u need feminism for getting respect, social status, affirmative action, presidencies and money from inferior men, but u need it too for pleasing superior men. To a superior man, it's sexier if the woman submitting to him is a feminist
MD feminists: his available time is way too important for him to waste it in mistreating a useless thing like you to your validation and happiness, so if you finally manage to persuade him to charitably grant you the privilege of being mistreated by him,
One only wants 2 b desired by those one oneself desires too. One only enjoys & feels validated by being enjoyed by those one oneself enjoys too. This is y mistreatment can only become an enjoyable thing 2 women when women submit it 2 the enjoyment of
If female inferiority's hypergamy can b defined as female inferiority's preference 4 superior men, it can b defined too as fem. inferiority's hatred 4 inferior men, i.e, feminism. So feminism is the institutionalization of female hypergamy, so its logical
Even people with a common blood type should donate if they can, specifically because it's common (because commonness means an increased need for it, too) (M)