While her man is fucking one of his other women, she cleans the house for his comfort. Then she'll give him more sexual pleasure, so he can go to work in a positive mood.
MD feminists, this is the correct position you should assume when begging your Master for the infinite privilege of being mistreated by Him and of your pain serving His pleasure and His orgasm
So this sex positive feminist does not subscribe to slut-shaming: she's proud of being just an inferior cum dump to the superior Men she needs and prefers. In fact, actually she's not a feminist, that's just what people think
Not all women do porn as a way of feminist activism, but some women might want to do. Here you have an example: thanks to feminism, this lady can do porn and positively enjoy sex.
In other words: own destruction, degradation and pain is still and as well another "kind of benefit or pleasure" a person can offer and submit when they're so inferior (women) that they can't produce any positive creation that is important and superior
Maledom Gentlemen, don't forget to remind your women frequently what their position and job within your relationship is and what they actually mean to you.
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
So here you have another wise sex-positive feminist, who liberatedly chose the sex profession because she loves feminist sex. She proudly shows off she's skilled enough for being so inferior, that she's superior from the viewpoint of her inferiority.
More feminist epistemology to you. Perhaps it doesn't produce science or technology directly by itself, but it makes men produce them, to feminists' benefit. (Also, somehow it gets feminists other important social positions among inferior men).
hypergamy isn't stupid, so feminists have their own win-win position concerning inferior men: if feminists have 2 b mistreated according 2 their inferiority, they'll only allow superior men 2 do it; but if they have 2 accept inferior men, they'll have 2 b
So since it's the inferior one that needs the superior one and not inversely, then it's the inferior one that is in the position of having to convince, and it's the superior that is in the position of having to be convinced. This is y women only grovel 2
female inferiority's preference for superior men can't be the wrong thing itself; the wrong thing is women try to reuse their positive treatment of superior men into an absence of positive treatment to inferior men so they get positive treatment, presiden
