So feminists have the freedom to choose not to approach a man. But if a man performs his freedom to choose not to approach a feminist, that man is destroying feminists' freedom and oppressing them. feminists want to see their freedom recognized without th
The perfect way of gaining inferior men's interest is saying bad, offensive and degrading things about them; but, Maledom ladies, if you want to be accepted by a Superior Man, you better talk very nice things about Him.
Gentlemen, if she wants sex, demand her to have her face and her hair perfectly clean; your feet are too important to use them on woman hair or face that are not clean.
My favorite thing about today's "liberated woman," AKA slut? They don't worry if you'll respect them in the morning. They just don't want you to respect them tonight. I use "slut" in the most loving sense.
feminists are complaining about people not being feminist; they forgot a thing exists which they call 'freedom' that enables people not to be feminist, and so they want to oppress people into feminism. It's only freedom if it benefits them
feminists only want to be mistreated by superior men and so to prevent inferior men from mistreating them. When women refuse to submit, it's not because it's indecent or immoral, but because the man they're supposed to submit to isn't superior
Since own mistreatment is the only unfake thing female inferiority can "contribute" (to transactionally mean it wants the relationship not to be to the sole woman's benefit), women get upset if superior men don't agree to mistreat them, and so they get up
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
