Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
So the justifying basis of the money, the quotas and the status of superiority women demand from inferior men, is the female inferiority women submit and pay to superior Men. inferior men pay the whores to superior Men; this is feminism
Every woman wishes she could find a Superior Man so she could justifiedly want to be done this by Him, in case she has to marry an inferior man in the future.
No matter how badly and depravedly do superior Men mistreat and degrade feminists, feminists will always find a way to justify it as compatible with feminism
All honorable women manage to find good reasons and pretexts when it comes to justify their submission and self-humiliation to a Superior Man who doesn't need to ask for sex or force sex. female inferiority is not a flaw, but a virtue when it helps women
I love when they invent they were abused or they can't choose another job or they were forced into it for justifying they just love it. feminism's ways are mysterious.
"how incredibly, and yet rationally and justifiably, i felt at his mercy. he was my master. he owned me. he could do whatever he wanted with me. he could trade me or sell me, or even slay me upon a whim, should he wish. i was absolutely his, his girl."
"how incredibly, and yet rationally and justifiably, i felt at his mercy. he was my master. he owned me. he could do whatever he wanted with me. he could trade me or sell me, or even slay me upon a whim, should he wish. i was absolutely his, his girl."
