Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
Since own mistreatment is the only unfake thing female inferiority can "contribute" (to transactionally mean it wants the relationship not to be to the sole woman's benefit), women get upset if superior men don't agree to mistreat them, and so they get up
MD feminists: picking superior men is NOT the wrong, guilty or mean thing (everyone would need to be hypergamous if they were inferior); the mean guilty thing is the attempt to use oneself's inferiority's preference for superior men as a fighting weapon a
Political correctness doesn't mean women's right not to be treated like inferior people by inferior men women aren't inferior to can only translate into inferior men having to treat women like superior people, but feminism knows the inferior men's inferio
During the war, when soldiers of the patriarchy would raid a feminist safe-house signs like this would be left as a warning to local cunts. As time passed, they took on supernatural meaning to locals who would recount stories of hearing feminine cries and