Only superior men logically know first-hand the actuality of women's inferiority. To women inferior men are like "social noise" women try to get useful things from (such as status, quotas, presidencies or money) via the institutionalisation of hypergamy a
Superior Men don't need anything important from women, superior Men don't need women. Superior Men only accept women who need them and their superiority. And only inferior women need superior Men. Therefore, superior Men only accept inferior women, inferi
Only superior Men are good and worth enough for demanding and making their acceptance conditional on women's greatest and best efforts and qualities. Only superior Men know the reality of women.
Men destroying feminism is not fun, it is disrespectful, and this is what other subreddits intend to give you. It is much better and fun women destroying feminism, and this is what /r/Maledom intends to give you.
women know their inferiority is real, but they only go real for real, superior Men. Only when a woman finds a superior Man (who's her female inferiority's best option) she happily shows off the superiority of her inferiority as the perfection of her infer
Only inferior men that haven't the slightest idea of what women are to superior men think that "who approaches who" is the important question to women. If "who approaches who" acquires the slightest trace of importance, she doesn't *really* see you as a s
