MD feminists: a "feministjob" is sexier than a handjob. It's when you use a feminist instead of your hand. So you can use feminism for pleasing your superior man too, as well as for getting respect, social status, quotas, presidencies and money from infer
Only superior men logically know first-hand the actuality of women's inferiority. To women inferior men are like "social noise" women try to get useful things from (such as status, quotas, presidencies or money) via the institutionalisation of hypergamy a
So women don't passively pay their inferiority to superior Men; every woman secretly runs the active seeking of a superior Man, and this seeking is even women's most important activity, even more important than trying to get respect, money, social status
So feminism has 2 cores incompatible to each other: 1-equality, the definitional core, which feminists use for getting social status, quotas and money from inferior men; 2-freedom of choice, i.e the possibility of getting out of equality, to submit to sup
It's already spring in the northern hemisphere and this year 2017 we have a more specific depiction of female nature's inferiority and of how do women use their inferiority to get accepted by superior men and to get respect, social status, affirmative act
MD feminists: u need feminism for getting respect, social status, affirmative action, presidencies and money from inferior men, but u need it too for pleasing superior men. To a superior man, it's sexier if the woman submitting to him is a feminist
women try to seduce superior men by implying other men are inferior to those superior men. women try to get respect, social status, quotas, affirmative action, presidencies, money and feminism from inferior men by implying other men are superior to those
