feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
No matter how inferior and incapable a woman is: every woman has a body, and this body can feel pain. The female free-but-optimizing genetic agency optimizingly delivers its inferior body to the most superior Man. Submitting to a superior Man makes women
women are so inferior that they're only cool if they're cool to superior Men. A superior Man's acceptance is the greatest achievement a woman can aspire to in her inferior female existence. A woman's superiority is the superiority of the Man she manages t
The superior person (Man) doesn't need the inferior person (woman), so they don't need to get accepted by the inferior one. It's the inferior person that needs the superior one, so they need to convince the superior one to accept them. This is why women o
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
Superior Men don't need superior women, so they only accept inferior women. So, in order to get accepted by a superior Man, a woman has to affirm she's inferior. So you have this fact of feminists affirming inferior men women are superior, but reminding s
So when a woman is unhappy about her husband, she says she is unhappy about the kitchen life, because there's just one thing in this world that can make female inferiority unhappy: inferior men. A woman married to a superior man is a woman happy to stay a
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
women know their inferiority is real, but they only go real for real, superior Men. Only when a woman finds a superior Man (who's her female inferiority's best option) she happily shows off the superiority of her inferiority as the perfection of her infer
Every woman wants to be considered a good, superior piece of inferior fuckmeat when it is within the logic of a relationship with a superior Man. That is, within the logic of such relationship, every woman wants her female inferiority to be the feature sh
A Man's prize is scientific and technological Progress ovr nature. A woman's prize is a Man; the more superior de Man, the happier, needier and more devoted the woman. Don't really talk science or technology to a woman when there is a superior Man in the
So since the inferior person (woman) needs the superior person (superior Man) and the superior person doesn't need the inferior one, then women's inferiority precisely and exactly need a superior Man who doesn't need female inferiority and so women themse
An important link: when a woman shows off as inferior fuckmeat whose only utility is to be abused, then she's trying to interest only a superior Man (since a weak person needs a powerful superior partner, and since superior Men don't need superior women a
The more, the better and the more enthusiastically does a woman show and prove she admires, acknowledges and worships a superior Man's superiority, the more acceptable she gets to that superior Man
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
The only genuinely and authentically happy woman is the woman accepted by a superior Man for her inferiority and for His inferior woman. Thanks to feminism, women have the freedom to submit their inferiority and dignity to superior Men, and the right to b
Since superior Men won't be interested in her for her inner virtues, she'll have to interest those Men by means of her body. Yes, she'll have to do this, since otherwise she'll have to live on her own, without any superior Man, like a superior woman
A superior man can only be a woman's best and happiest option in life if that woman's inferiority is authentic. An inferior man is never a woman's best option. A woman's enjoyment of her abuse, degradation and mistreatment by a superior man is reciprocall
A superior person never rejects an inferior person. A superior man would fuck every woman in the world if he could, and he'd never reject a woman into one of his harems. The only reason why a woman rejects a man is that she's inferior and there is another
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
In order not to be treated as inferior by a woman, a superior man will show his superiority. In order not to be treated as inferior by a man, a woman will choose to be treated as inferior by another different man (superior to the former). A woman's superi
No superior woman would ever need to pretend or fake she's inferior; female inferiority and female submission to superior men aren't fake, only female superiority is. female superiority is the simulated, fantasy role wymyn play against inferior men
A hypothetical superior woman would not like being treated like an inferior woman for the simple reason that she's not inferior. But an inferior woman doesn't like being treated as inferior either if it has to be done by inferior men, bc being treated as
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
So a woman will try to make inferior men elect her president because her husband was a president. There is a reason to female biological inferiority's hypergamy. A woman's superiority is her male partner's superiority
So a woman rejects a man because she is picky, and she is picky because she is inferior and so she needs a superior man. A superior man, however, would fuck every woman in the world if he could
So an inferior man wants a woman's body; a superior man wants a woman's consent, even her begging, & her happy will to get her degradation accepted by that superior man. Inferior men want women's body because they can't win their consent, and this is
Superiority can be somehow thought as the destruction of inferiority, which gives us another meaning for erotic pain and degradation, since when a woman destroys her own inferior existence she becomes qualified, hence "superior", for a superior man
