women's studies says it's disrespect only if you do it without her consent. Turns out this implies it is not disrespect if you do it with her consent. So this axiom is the secret back door women's studies keeps for protecting equality defenders' preferenc
It looks like Reddit's owners are maneuvering so they can ban this subreddit (very possibly), so the fun might end soon. If they banned this subreddit, Reddit's owners would prove that managing the neutrality and the freedom they say they defend is too mu
Artificial gender equality defenders have learned that the superior Men they need and prefer don't like and don't accept feminism. This hasn't made them reject feminism, but it has made them use the principles of feminism against inferior men, which is a
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Another hypergamous artificial gender equality defender proving her superior Man she wants His happiness and well-being too, by way of own pain. It's what typically happens when she can't get the important things she gets from Him on her own and without H
So there are two kinds of toiletification: unwilling toiletification, which is a bad one and is the one being fought by feminism; and self-toiletification, wich is female-freedom based and so it's good and defended by feminism, and it's used by female inf
feminists love to express how much they enjoy and love anal. Thanks to feminism and to the sex and Patriarchy workers feminism has always defended and supported, human sex has gradually progressed toward a more egalitarian sex
Artificial gender equality defenders' preference for superior Men is simply based on female inferiority. Superior people don't need to beg other people for things they can achieve on their own. women would not pay their curves if they could achieve the th
So yes, the choosing of a superior Man is the universal ace every artificial gender equality defender has up her sleeve for when she's required to actually prove her superior capabilities and she can't do anything but admit she's just a cum dump
The Patriarchy's women gave their husbands sex in exchange for money. Modern feminists do the exact same thing, sex for money, only they beg for it because feminism defends their freedom to do it, thus rendering the Patriarchy non-oppressive. feminism alw
So artificial gender equality defending feminists prefer superior Men because, due to female inferiority, this is the only thing women can do and contribute in order to be accepted by Men (whether superior or inferior men). An inferior being wouldn't try
Another display of the important assets, with no possibility to defend herself, interfere with probing hands and toys, and no way to complain either gagged as she is. all she can do is watch what happens, and accept that holes and tits are of more importa
In other words: if once given the freedom this is their idea of defending and furthering feminism itself, I don't even want to imagine how would they unsupervisedly govern a country
Your step dad was never kind to you. And there was nothing much you could do. When he started taking an interest in your sister, you couldn't defend her. Those long weekends with your mom away, she now took the blunt of his abuse. She was trying to protec
You always wonder how your lawyer wife can stand being a public defender given the monstrous amount of work, but she says it's so easy she can do two at a time.
You defended your mom when your bully called her a fat pig whore. What you didn’t know was your mom hired him as a personal trainer and she rides his cock while screaming “PLEASE FUCK THE FST PIG WHORE OUT OF ME!”
