Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
women r open 2 polygyny, but only with superior Men. If a woman wants sex once in a month & a superior Man wants sex 30 times in a month, then if He has 30 wives they'll all live happy about sex. Polygyny is the most natural & stablest marriage. A
feminists say women like and enjoy sex as much as Men. So, here you have a happy woman enjoying sex. Since she's enjoying it as much as him, she won't ask for any payment in exchange after the sex. If anything, she paid and begged for it
No matter how inferior and incapable a woman is: every woman has a body, and this body can feel pain. The female free-but-optimizing genetic agency optimizingly delivers its inferior body to the most superior Man. Submitting to a superior Man makes women
When a woman says she's strong and independent, she means the weakness is strong in her, and she has independence to depend on a man who is superior. Here you have two smart strong independent submissive feminists enjoying sex as much as men
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
women know their inferiority is real, but they only go real for real, superior Men. Only when a woman finds a superior Man (who's her female inferiority's best option) she happily shows off the superiority of her inferiority as the perfection of her infer
Every woman wants to be considered a good, superior piece of inferior fuckmeat when it is within the logic of a relationship with a superior Man. That is, within the logic of such relationship, every woman wants her female inferiority to be the feature sh
So whether a woman's body is a sexual object, or a cum, urine or spit dump, in a given circumstance or not isn't a man's decision (at least not a superior man's decision), but it's that woman's decision, which is humane 2 grant her since her body is the o
An important link: when a woman shows off as inferior fuckmeat whose only utility is to be abused, then she's trying to interest only a superior Man (since a weak person needs a powerful superior partner, and since superior Men don't need superior women a
inferior men think women's role "in the streets" is their real and normal behavior, and what they do "in the sheets" is their exceptional role. It's the other way around: what a woman does in the sheets is her real and normal behavior, and what she does i
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
It's the inferior one that needs the superior one, not the other way around. It's the inferior one that desires & loves, and that desires & loves to be desired & loved. It's the woman that loves and loves to be loved. Only the woman's love is
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
MD feminists, this woman's day is a good day to remember that your greatest aspiration in life as females is that of being accepted and treated accordingly to the actuality and biologicality of your inferiority by the superior men that are your female inf
Every woman, even a hypothetically superior one, could be used as a toilet. It's the fact that this is the best thing female inferiority can honestly contribute that makes women happy to be used as a toilet when it is by men that are superior
Since own mistreatment is the only unfake thing female inferiority can "contribute" (to transactionally mean it wants the relationship not to be to the sole woman's benefit), women get upset if superior men don't agree to mistreat them, and so they get up
Gents: whether a woman won't want to have sex with you at all, she'll give you a little sex but on the condition that she can have sex with other men too, or she'll only want to have ALL the sex with you, mustn't depend on what you tell her to do, but on
feminists want men to behave like gentlemen, but feminists themselves want to behave like whores, so Gentlemen remember: whenever you're expected to act like a real gentleman, do it only for a woman who's a real lady
So Gents, remember: even if you could get accepted by a woman as an inferior man, *you* don't want to be accepted by a woman as an inferior man, but as a superior, gym man. So it's not simply about what she wants; it's about what *you* want. So one way or
So the thing that makes a woman's body "sexy" (in the sense of being something you would accept for her contribution within a transaction) is not its curves, it's the fact of the female inferiority that disables that woman for contributing anything better
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
So if a woman rejects inferior men and she picks the best possible man she finds, she's a smart modern feminist who uses her freedom wisely and whose choice must be respected. But if a man only accepts women that submit to him, his masculinity is toxic
So, broadly speaking, this is female morals: a real, decent, respectable woman is a woman capable enough of being treated accordingly to the actuality and authenticity of her inferiority by a superior man, and capable enough of not being treated like that
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
So a woman rejects a man because she is picky, and she is picky because she is inferior and so she needs a superior man. A superior man, however, would fuck every woman in the world if he could
feminism isn't about not rejecting a female candidate 4 a given job on the basis that she is a woman but that she's inferior 2 a male candidate; feminism is about picking a female candidate 4 a job even if she's inferior, just because she's a woman. That'
So, Gents, if you're still wondering whether who approaches who or who will take the first step is the important thing to women, you're several centuries late to the party and several light years away of modern woman's sexuality. The modern woman crawls t
