feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
No matter how inferior and incapable a woman is: every woman has a body, and this body can feel pain. The female free-but-optimizing genetic agency optimizingly delivers its inferior body to the most superior Man. Submitting to a superior Man makes women
women are so inferior that they're only cool if they're cool to superior Men. A superior Man's acceptance is the greatest achievement a woman can aspire to in her inferior female existence. A woman's superiority is the superiority of the Man she manages t
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Every woman wishes she could find a Superior Man so she could justifiedly want to be done this by Him, in case she has to marry an inferior man in the future.
Degradation and maltreatment are forcing a woman to do this for a man she doesn't like. Respecting the freedom of a woman to behave even like this for the man she chooses, is respecting that woman's rights, and therefore it's feminism.
So when a woman is unhappy about her husband, she says she is unhappy about the kitchen life, because there's just one thing in this world that can make female inferiority unhappy: inferior men. A woman married to a superior man is a woman happy to stay a
The female body is not beautiful in itself, but its authentic beauty only exists when it's offered by the woman as her gift to a man, and then the female body's true beauty is a meaning: the meaning that that man receiving her body is superior, cause that
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
Every woman wants to be considered a good, superior piece of inferior fuckmeat when it is within the logic of a relationship with a superior Man. That is, within the logic of such relationship, every woman wants her female inferiority to be the feature sh
So whether a woman's body is a sexual object, or a cum, urine or spit dump, in a given circumstance or not isn't a man's decision (at least not a superior man's decision), but it's that woman's decision, which is humane 2 grant her since her body is the o
So since the inferior person (woman) needs the superior person (superior Man) and the superior person doesn't need the inferior one, then women's inferiority precisely and exactly need a superior Man who doesn't need female inferiority and so women themse
The more, the better and the more enthusiastically does a woman show and prove she admires, acknowledges and worships a superior Man's superiority, the more acceptable she gets to that superior Man
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
Gents, remember that feminist things like "no slut-shaming" or "partner count doesn't matter" comprise a purpose around female inferiority's hypergamy: a woman could only need 2 get accepted by an inferior man after she submitted 2 a superior man
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
The only genuinely and authentically happy woman is the woman accepted by a superior Man for her inferiority and for His inferior woman. Thanks to feminism, women have the freedom to submit their inferiority and dignity to superior Men, and the right to b
The difference between Male & female genders is a superior man won't allow women to treat him as inferior bc of the actuality of his superiority, but a woman won't allow a man 2 treat her as inferior bc she can be treated as inferior by another man wh
So Gents, remember: even if you could get accepted by a woman as an inferior man, *you* don't want to be accepted by a woman as an inferior man, but as a superior, gym man. So it's not simply about what she wants; it's about what *you* want. So one way or
A superior person never rejects an inferior person. A superior man would fuck every woman in the world if he could, and he'd never reject a woman into one of his harems. The only reason why a woman rejects a man is that she's inferior and there is another
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
If a woman doesn't want 2 have a sexual relationship with a man she's an independent woman that uses her freedom. But if a man doesn't want to have an economic-professional relationship with a woman he's a sexist and she'll report him so the authorities w
In order not to be treated as inferior by a woman, a superior man will show his superiority. In order not to be treated as inferior by a man, a woman will choose to be treated as inferior by another different man (superior to the former). A woman's superi
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
So a woman rejects a man because she is picky, and she is picky because she is inferior and so she needs a superior man. A superior man, however, would fuck every woman in the world if he could
So an inferior man wants a woman's body; a superior man wants a woman's consent, even her begging, & her happy will to get her degradation accepted by that superior man. Inferior men want women's body because they can't win their consent, and this is
"it is hard to be a man," i said, "until one stands in a relation to a woman. and, i suppose, it is hard to be a woman until one stands in a relation to a man."
