she has the freedom to be objectified. feminism criticizes objectification, but it should criticize only the fact of a woman being objectified *against her free will*; i.e. feminism should only criticize the act of not respecting female free will. Another
Since own pain, degradation and self-destruction is the only contribution the unproductive and useless female inferiority can make in order to please a man, and since a superior Man is female inferiority's best option, then women only enjoy being mistreat
MD feminists: remember that female bisexuality and female polygyny are part of female sexiness and beauty to the superior Men your female inferiority chooses
The female body is not beautiful in itself, but its authentic beauty only exists when it's offered by the woman as her gift to a man, and then the female body's true beauty is a meaning: the meaning that that man receiving her body is superior, cause that
Authentic and full female sexuality can only be well understood with reference to the superior Men female inferiority needs and prefers; i.e, genuine female sexuality can only be understood as female sexuality being the only way female inferiority is capa
So yes, freedom is the perfect disguise for female inferiority. feminism wasn't even interested in equality of rights; it secretly wanted freedom and quotas for disguising female inferiority and allowing women to choose only Superior Men. Well played, fem
The only validation that is genuine and authentic to the biological inferiority of the female gender is the validation of female inferiority itself's inferior ways of pleasing men that are superior getting indeed accepted by superior men
It's the inferior that needs the superior. It's women that are picky, women are the choosing party: female inferiority prefers superior men over inferior men. Men are promiscuous: the winning male would pass his genes to all the females; there's only one
So: 1-A logical link exists between female inferiority and female preference for superior men; 2-This combined fact of female inferiority's preference for superior men holds a position definitional to female nature: women are just superior man-pursuing in
So since picking superior men is the best choice female inferiority can make, somehow we can see it and understand it as preference for superior men being the only "strength" and "independence" of female inferiority, which is why feminism demands respect
So the only thing that could validly and completely qualify the female inferior carnal attributes and female submission and degradation as the female contribution within a transactional relationship, is that the woman is inferior and so she can't contribu
A superior man is the only happy goal of female inferiority in life. This fact is so essential, definitional and genetic to the inferior female nature that we can state that if all men were *EXACTLY* the same, withouth the slightest differences among them
So behind female respectability is not the female superiority feminism wants inferior, female president-electing men to believe in, but the female non-respectability female inferiority needs to seduce superior men with
MD feminists: anal is a good sexual method cause it makes it clear to the superior men your female inferiority needs and prefers that sex is the only unfake benefit your female inferiority can contribute (since anal pain is no benefit to yourself) and so
No superior woman would ever need to pretend or fake she's inferior; female inferiority and female submission to superior men aren't fake, only female superiority is. female superiority is the simulated, fantasy role wymyn play against inferior men
Although female inferiority can only make contributions that r inferior & useless 2 superior men, they're the best female inferiority can contribute, so women want superior men 2 value & regard women's inferior offerings (of women's own suffering)
Wait for it. The moment the wife gets home to her hubby making homemade porn with another another and accidently walks into frame only to politely back out of the shot.
