Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Degradation and maltreatment are forcing a woman to do this for a man she doesn't like. Respecting the freedom of a woman to behave even like this for the man she chooses, is respecting that woman's rights, and therefore it's feminism.
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
The only genuinely and authentically happy woman is the woman accepted by a superior Man for her inferiority and for His inferior woman. Thanks to feminism, women have the freedom to submit their inferiority and dignity to superior Men, and the right to b
So the thing that makes a woman's body "sexy" (in the sense of being something you would accept for her contribution within a transaction) is not its curves, it's the fact of the female inferiority that disables that woman for contributing anything better
A hypothetical superior woman would not like being treated like an inferior woman for the simple reason that she's not inferior. But an inferior woman doesn't like being treated as inferior either if it has to be done by inferior men, bc being treated as
