women's studies says it's disrespect only if you do it without her consent. Turns out this implies it is not disrespect if you do it with her consent. So this axiom is the secret back door women's studies keeps for protecting equality defenders' preferenc
So should her former sexual partner count matter? We're bringing r/MD's principle on this again: to a superior man, the only thing she can do for her former sexual partner count to not matter is that she degrades herself for that new superior man more tha
Not all women do porn as a way of feminist activism, but some women might want to do. Here you have an example: thanks to feminism, this lady can do porn and positively enjoy sex.
So yes: not only do feminists admit their female gender's inferiority when this inferiority is an means of their own they can use to get accepted by a superior Man, but they even show off this inferiority as some skillful, qualifying and superior ability
You may think getting your ass destroyed is an easy job, but sex is actually work to womyn, that is, something you can do and you do to obtain in return other things you can't achieve on your own. This is why sex workers exist; in fact, sex workers are th
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Degradation and maltreatment are forcing a woman to do this for a man she doesn't like. Respecting the freedom of a woman to behave even like this for the man she chooses, is respecting that woman's rights, and therefore it's feminism.
Since superior Men won't be interested in her for her inner virtues, she'll have to interest those Men by means of her body. Yes, she'll have to do this, since otherwise she'll have to live on her own, without any superior Man, like a superior woman
So artificial gender equality defending feminists prefer superior Men because, due to female inferiority, this is the only thing women can do and contribute in order to be accepted by Men (whether superior or inferior men). An inferior being wouldn't try
To women there's only one shameful, immoral & prejudicial thing they can do: to lower or degrade themselves to inferior men. female inferiority sees in superior men its best & due reward. This is y being degraded & mistreated by superior men i
It's already spring in the northern hemisphere and this year 2017 we have a more specific depiction of female nature's inferiority and of how do women use their inferiority to get accepted by superior men and to get respect, social status, affirmative act
Gents: approaching a feminist can b chivalrous only if she *earned your approach*, which means she let u know she's interested in u (women can do this without using words or approaching). Otherwise u r approaching her bc u r an inferior man, & inferio
Honor has to do with not being mistreated or treated as inferior by people who are equal to oneself. This is why, to women, being mistreated by inferior men is dishonorable, but being capable of being mistreated by superior men is a kind of "female honora
