feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
women are so inferior that they're only cool if they're cool to superior Men. A superior Man's acceptance is the greatest achievement a woman can aspire to in her inferior female existence. A woman's superiority is the superiority of the Man she manages t
Remember that this subreddit is just fantasy. Everybody, feminists included, knows that real life women are as superior as Men and so they need no superior Man and they're strong and superior Man-independent, this is why they only accept and prefer inferi
So when women want a superior Man, they accordingly know they want a Man women themselves will have to convince and beg to. This is why women only strive to convince and beg superior Men
A Man's prize is scientific and technological Progress ovr nature. A woman's prize is a Man; the more superior de Man, the happier, needier and more devoted the woman. Don't really talk science or technology to a woman when there is a superior Man in the
When it comes 2 inferior men, feminism's core definition logically is gender equality (u can't call an inferior man a superior man). When it comes 2 superior men, feminism's core definit. is freedom of choice, comprising abilities such as choosing & s
The inferior female mind gets existentially defined by its deep secret need, love & desire for superior men, and its deep secret hate for inferior men. But no man should ever blame women for hypergamy, bc no man would ever want a daughter of his to ma
So an inferior man wants a woman's body; a superior man wants a woman's consent, even her begging, & her happy will to get her degradation accepted by that superior man. Inferior men want women's body because they can't win their consent, and this is