It was determined by interrogators that Rachel Hart is not, in fact, affiliated with feminist movements. However, she was behind in paying her temporary freedom license fees, and is now making the rounds at the entertainment division. Smile, Rachel!
So yes: not only do feminists admit their female gender's inferiority when this inferiority is an means of their own they can use to get accepted by a superior Man, but they even show off this inferiority as some skillful, qualifying and superior ability
The feminist brainwash helps women get rid of inferior men. The Maledom brainwash helps women be accepted by the superior Men they need and prefer. So both brainwashes are not incompatible, but they complement each other
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
Another intellectually superior feminist who haughtily demands respect and reverence when she's not with hubby. To the extent of demanding inferior men and kids to buy the book she says she wrote.
MD feminists: you can only opt-out of the definition of perfect sex to the superior Men your female inferiority needs, prefers and can only brag about, not change that definition
The modern Internet is not Men debasing women: it's women debasing women. The reason is that web places like this little known subreddit have helped modern feminists understand that their inferiority is the logical attribute that gets them the superior Me
Gents, remember: if you let them walk all over you they'll say you're a nice feminist guy. If you simply adopt a behavior of not allowing them to walk over you but protecting yourself accordingly and legitimately, they'll say your masculinity is toxic. Th
Freedom is very important to feminism. It's freedom, not gender equality, that becomes the core of feminism when it doesn't come to inferior men. Here u have a feminist that uses her freedom a lot, so I'm sure feminism would love her for its next women's
MD feminists: remember that dignity is not sexy to the superior men your female inferiority needs and prefers. Use dignity only to get affirmative action, presidencies, feminism and money from inferior men
women expect superior men to treat them the way superior men should treat women, and they expect inferior men to treat them the way inferior men should do. So it's not how women get treated what feminists complain about, but the mismatch between how they
MD feminists: picking superior men is NOT the wrong, guilty or mean thing (everyone would need to be hypergamous if they were inferior); the mean guilty thing is the attempt to use oneself's inferiority's preference for superior men as a fighting weapon a
MD feminists: you are not a toilet; you are less than your Master's toilet. So if you ever suspect your Master is starting to use his toilet more than he uses you, be quick and do your best
"Do you prefer an inferior male partner/a male partner who is not superior to you?" is the only question you will need in every debate with a male supremacy-fighting strong independent feminist
Misogyny doesn't really need to be the problem: women could simply prefer and choose inferior men who actually believe in female superiority, who are feminist and who are not misogynistic. But real life women don't prefer inferior men, cause such is the l
