She's not thinking about money, or her job, her friends, her obligations, or her responsibilities. She's not thinking. She's totally in the moment, his cock in her ass, her head underfoot. It's very zen. In submission, she's found Nirvana.
So feminists have the freedom to choose not to approach a man. But if a man performs his freedom to choose not to approach a feminist, that man is destroying feminists' freedom and oppressing them. feminists want to see their freedom recognized without th
feminism is not against objectification; feminism is only against inferior men. Which is logical: feminism can't criticize the superiority of a Man who is actually superior.
So this subreddit is not about female inferiority and worthlessness as a negative quality (offensive misogyny), but about female inferiority and worthlessness as the quality of sexiness, sexiness meaning "existence based and depending on superior Men" (er
When Men treated women like inferior beings forcibly and against women's will, feminism was a demand for freedom and liberation. Now that women freely and liberatedly behave like inferior submissive beings, feminism says freedom is not an important thing.
So yeah, women are free to be feminist and superior, but we are free to not be interested in them and we are free to not choose them; we are free to prefer inferior, carnal women.
Another intellectually superior feminist who haughtily demands respect and reverence when she's not with hubby. To the extent of demanding inferior men and kids to buy the book she says she wrote.
So whether a woman's body is a sexual object, or a cum, urine or spit dump, in a given circumstance or not isn't a man's decision (at least not a superior man's decision), but it's that woman's decision, which is humane 2 grant her since her body is the o
MD feminists: you can only opt-out of the definition of perfect sex to the superior Men your female inferiority needs, prefers and can only brag about, not change that definition
The modern Internet is not Men debasing women: it's women debasing women. The reason is that web places like this little known subreddit have helped modern feminists understand that their inferiority is the logical attribute that gets them the superior Me
Artificial gender equality defenders' preference for superior Men is simply based on female inferiority. Superior people don't need to beg other people for things they can achieve on their own. women would not pay their curves if they could achieve the th
Honestly I like to see my posts cause bad subscribers to leave, cause I think some people are not getting something: this subreddit is only intended for superior Men who think women are inferior, and for women who admit their female inferiority to superio
So /r/maledom's ladies, the bad news is you have to choose between either superior males or feminism, but not both; feminism is not sexually interesting, attracting, convincing or motivating to superior males who can choose and set conditions. Although yo
In other words: to women, the only possible indecency is to not do what is best for themselves or to do what is worst to themselves; namely, to women the only indecent thing is to submit to inferior men. Submitting to a superior Man is the best and most d
feminists are complaining about people not being feminist; they forgot a thing exists which they call 'freedom' that enables people not to be feminist, and so they want to oppress people into feminism. It's only freedom if it benefits them
Inferiority & superiority are relative: for an inferior person to exist, there needs to exist a superior person too. This is why the fact that women are just inferior human garbage to superior men does NOT make women inferior human garbage in an absol
Freedom is very important to feminism. It's freedom, not gender equality, that becomes the core of feminism when it doesn't come to inferior men. Here u have a feminist that uses her freedom a lot, so I'm sure feminism would love her for its next women's
women are so inferior the only unfake benefit they can contribute men is the proof of women themselves not being the ones gaining any benefit. This is why women contribute their pain & degradation to the superior men their female inferiority needs &am
feminists only want to be mistreated by superior men and so to prevent inferior men from mistreating them. When women refuse to submit, it's not because it's indecent or immoral, but because the man they're supposed to submit to isn't superior
MD feminists: remember that dignity is not sexy to the superior men your female inferiority needs and prefers. Use dignity only to get affirmative action, presidencies, feminism and money from inferior men
Since own mistreatment is the only unfake thing female inferiority can "contribute" (to transactionally mean it wants the relationship not to be to the sole woman's benefit), women get upset if superior men don't agree to mistreat them, and so they get up
MD feminists: picking superior men is NOT the wrong, guilty or mean thing (everyone would need to be hypergamous if they were inferior); the mean guilty thing is the attempt to use oneself's inferiority's preference for superior men as a fighting weapon a
MD feminists, remember: it's not mistreatment or degradation if you wanted and begged it to happen. Therefore it's not mistreatment or degradation if it is done to you by a superior man
Within our concept frame, we can easily state that the basic gift female inferiority contributes superior men is a "differential gift", consisting in the simple female behavior of not getting angry when the superior man mistreats her, like she would get a
Gents, remember: it's the inferior one that needs the superior one, not the other way around, and so it's women that pursue superior men, and this is what you want. This means that if you have to approach or pursue her, it's you yourself already turning i
The thing inferior men won't understand (given their very inferiority & inexperience) is that the funny thing is not the act itself of mistreating a woman; the funny thing is the fact itself of that woman wishing you to mistreat her because you are a
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
So behind female respectability is not the female superiority feminism wants inferior, female president-electing men to believe in, but the female non-respectability female inferiority needs to seduce superior men with
So feminism just tries to make the society acknowledge the logical truth of the idea that women's right not to be treated like inferior people by men that are inferior too can't get obstructed by women's right to be treated like inferior people by superio
Superior men can have an interaction/noninteraction mentality: their alternative 2 treating women like inferior people is 2 not interact with them. Inferior men have an inferiority/superiority mentality: their alternative 2 treating women like inferior pe
Given the circumstance, women look really good at looking like they're not inferior despite their inferiority, but there is a trick to it: it only takes inferior inexperienced men
Honor has to do with not being mistreated or treated as inferior by people who are equal to oneself. This is why, to women, being mistreated by inferior men is dishonorable, but being capable of being mistreated by superior men is a kind of "female honora
Misogyny doesn't really need to be the problem: women could simply prefer and choose inferior men who actually believe in female superiority, who are feminist and who are not misogynistic. But real life women don't prefer inferior men, cause such is the l
