The definition of "woman" can be considered from two different but equivalent perspectives: A) what women say to superior Men they are; and B) what women say to inferior men they aren't
women r open 2 polygyny, but only with superior Men. If a woman wants sex once in a month & a superior Man wants sex 30 times in a month, then if He has 30 wives they'll all live happy about sex. Polygyny is the most natural & stablest marriage. A
Sex is fundamentally an act whereby a woman confidentially uses her inferiority as her natural contribution to the relationship, and agrees to be accepted by her inferiority and as an inferior being to a Superior Man. From this carnal contribution, breedi
After all, a woman can be good, superior, at making something as inferior and easy as a sandwich, or at giving a blowjob. This is female "superiority", and women will only use these "best" assets of theirs to achieve their most important goals: the "best"
When a woman says she's strong and independent, she means the weakness is strong in her, and she has independence to depend on a man who is superior. Here you have two smart strong independent submissive feminists enjoying sex as much as men
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Every woman wishes she could find a Superior Man so she could justifiedly want to be done this by Him, in case she has to marry an inferior man in the future.
So since inferiority is definitional to the female gender, then inferiority can't be seen as simple "inferiority" or "worthlessness", but as the "female qualification"; that is, the greater her inferiority, the greater and more superior the woman (to a su
Degradation and maltreatment are forcing a woman to do this for a man she doesn't like. Respecting the freedom of a woman to behave even like this for the man she chooses, is respecting that woman's rights, and therefore it's feminism.
Modern liberated women recompense the shopping payer the same way ancient non-liberated women did. Modern woman's liberation is a big feminist proclamation of Male Superiority.
The female body is not beautiful in itself, but its authentic beauty only exists when it's offered by the woman as her gift to a man, and then the female body's true beauty is a meaning: the meaning that that man receiving her body is superior, cause that
So women don't passively pay their inferiority to superior Men; every woman secretly runs the active seeking of a superior Man, and this seeking is even women's most important activity, even more important than trying to get respect, money, social status
So whether a woman's body is a sexual object, or a cum, urine or spit dump, in a given circumstance or not isn't a man's decision (at least not a superior man's decision), but it's that woman's decision, which is humane 2 grant her since her body is the o
It's the inferior one that needs the superior one, not the other way around. It's the inferior one that desires & loves, and that desires & loves to be desired & loved. It's the woman that loves and loves to be loved. Only the woman's love is
Gents, remember that feminist things like "no slut-shaming" or "partner count doesn't matter" comprise a purpose around female inferiority's hypergamy: a woman could only need 2 get accepted by an inferior man after she submitted 2 a superior man
What is a woman, but the set of her abilities? Guess what? Yeah, women only apply their actual definition to Superior Men; Superior Men know well what women actually are.
Personal inferiority entails the logical necessity of being picky when it comes to having a parner. This is why both women are picky about men and inferior men are picky about women. A real superior man would enjoy using and abusing every woman in the wor
Every woman, even a hypothetically superior one, could be used as a toilet. It's the fact that this is the best thing female inferiority can honestly contribute that makes women happy to be used as a toilet when it is by men that are superior
The difference between Male & female genders is a superior man won't allow women to treat him as inferior bc of the actuality of his superiority, but a woman won't allow a man 2 treat her as inferior bc she can be treated as inferior by another man wh
female inferior carnal attributes are inferior and so they can't be "superior" or "beautiful" in themselves, unless they're the "best", "most superior" thing the woman can contribute. That is: inferiority, not anatomy itself, is the "sexy" "beautiful" thi
So Gents, remember: even if you could get accepted by a woman as an inferior man, *you* don't want to be accepted by a woman as an inferior man, but as a superior, gym man. So it's not simply about what she wants; it's about what *you* want. So one way or
If a woman doesn't want 2 have a sexual relationship with a man she's an independent woman that uses her freedom. But if a man doesn't want to have an economic-professional relationship with a woman he's a sexist and she'll report him so the authorities w
MD feminists: u need feminism for getting respect, social status, affirmative action, presidencies and money from inferior men, but u need it too for pleasing superior men. To a superior man, it's sexier if the woman submitting to him is a feminist
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
So, broadly speaking, this is female morals: a real, decent, respectable woman is a woman capable enough of being treated accordingly to the actuality and authenticity of her inferiority by a superior man, and capable enough of not being treated like that
Gents: when u r superior, she wants 2 b accepted & taken by u (as well as she wants u). No woman is interested in being accepted by an inferior man. It's the inferior one that needs the superior; it's the inferior that loves & needs 2 b loved. No
