feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
she has the freedom to be objectified. feminism criticizes objectification, but it should criticize only the fact of a woman being objectified *against her free will*; i.e. feminism should only criticize the act of not respecting female free will. Another
Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
No matter how inferior and incapable a woman is: every woman has a body, and this body can feel pain. The female free-but-optimizing genetic agency optimizingly delivers its inferior body to the most superior Man. Submitting to a superior Man makes women
women are so inferior that they're only cool if they're cool to superior Men. A superior Man's acceptance is the greatest achievement a woman can aspire to in her inferior female existence. A woman's superiority is the superiority of the Man she manages t
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
Degradation and maltreatment are forcing a woman to do this for a man she doesn't like. Respecting the freedom of a woman to behave even like this for the man she chooses, is respecting that woman's rights, and therefore it's feminism.
So when a woman is unhappy about her husband, she says she is unhappy about the kitchen life, because there's just one thing in this world that can make female inferiority unhappy: inferior men. A woman married to a superior man is a woman happy to stay a
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
women know their inferiority is real, but they only go real for real, superior Men. Only when a woman finds a superior Man (who's her female inferiority's best option) she happily shows off the superiority of her inferiority as the perfection of her infer
Every woman wants to be considered a good, superior piece of inferior fuckmeat when it is within the logic of a relationship with a superior Man. That is, within the logic of such relationship, every woman wants her female inferiority to be the feature sh
So whether a woman's body is a sexual object, or a cum, urine or spit dump, in a given circumstance or not isn't a man's decision (at least not a superior man's decision), but it's that woman's decision, which is humane 2 grant her since her body is the o
A Man's prize is scientific and technological Progress ovr nature. A woman's prize is a Man; the more superior de Man, the happier, needier and more devoted the woman. Don't really talk science or technology to a woman when there is a superior Man in the
An important link: when a woman shows off as inferior fuckmeat whose only utility is to be abused, then she's trying to interest only a superior Man (since a weak person needs a powerful superior partner, and since superior Men don't need superior women a
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
It's the inferior one that needs the superior one, not the other way around. It's the inferior one that desires & loves, and that desires & loves to be desired & loved. It's the woman that loves and loves to be loved. Only the woman's love is
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
So Gents, remember: even if you could get accepted by a woman as an inferior man, *you* don't want to be accepted by a woman as an inferior man, but as a superior, gym man. So it's not simply about what she wants; it's about what *you* want. So one way or
The thing inferior men won't understand (given their very inferiority & inexperience) is that the funny thing is not the act itself of mistreating a woman; the funny thing is the fact itself of that woman wishing you to mistreat her because you are a
So the thing that makes a woman's body "sexy" (in the sense of being something you would accept for her contribution within a transaction) is not its curves, it's the fact of the female inferiority that disables that woman for contributing anything better
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
If a woman doesn't want 2 have a sexual relationship with a man she's an independent woman that uses her freedom. But if a man doesn't want to have an economic-professional relationship with a woman he's a sexist and she'll report him so the authorities w
In order not to be treated as inferior by a woman, a superior man will show his superiority. In order not to be treated as inferior by a man, a woman will choose to be treated as inferior by another different man (superior to the former). A woman's superi
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
The only immoral and indecent thing a woman can do is to submit to someone she doesn't need and she even hates, namely, an inferior man. female inferiority sees and feels dignity in sacrificing its dignity to superior men and only to them
So, broadly speaking, this is female morals: a real, decent, respectable woman is a woman capable enough of being treated accordingly to the actuality and authenticity of her inferiority by a superior man, and capable enough of not being treated like that
A hypothetical superior woman would not like being treated like an inferior woman for the simple reason that she's not inferior. But an inferior woman doesn't like being treated as inferior either if it has to be done by inferior men, bc being treated as
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
So a woman will try to make inferior men elect her president because her husband was a president. There is a reason to female biological inferiority's hypergamy. A woman's superiority is her male partner's superiority
So a woman rejects a man because she is picky, and she is picky because she is inferior and so she needs a superior man. A superior man, however, would fuck every woman in the world if he could
So an inferior man wants a woman's body; a superior man wants a woman's consent, even her begging, & her happy will to get her degradation accepted by that superior man. Inferior men want women's body because they can't win their consent, and this is
feminism isn't about not rejecting a female candidate 4 a given job on the basis that she is a woman but that she's inferior 2 a male candidate; feminism is about picking a female candidate 4 a job even if she's inferior, just because she's a woman. That'
So, Gents, if you're still wondering whether who approaches who or who will take the first step is the important thing to women, you're several centuries late to the party and several light years away of modern woman's sexuality. The modern woman crawls t
