Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
No woman would do this for a man if this man is so inferior that he's unable to achieve on his own things that she can't achieve on her own neither. Artificial gender equality defenders love to claim women are superior, but they all reject the inferior me
Every woman wishes she could find a Superior Man so she could justifiedly want to be done this by Him, in case she has to marry an inferior man in the future.
So when a woman is unhappy about her husband, she says she is unhappy about the kitchen life, because there's just one thing in this world that can make female inferiority unhappy: inferior men. A woman married to a superior man is a woman happy to stay a
The female body is not beautiful in itself, but its authentic beauty only exists when it's offered by the woman as her gift to a man, and then the female body's true beauty is a meaning: the meaning that that man receiving her body is superior, cause that
Either being a superior woman whose male partner is not superior to her; or being an inferior woman whose male partner is a Superior Man. Maledom feminists, make your choice.
Every woman wants to be considered a good, superior piece of inferior fuckmeat when it is within the logic of a relationship with a superior Man. That is, within the logic of such relationship, every woman wants her female inferiority to be the feature sh
So since the inferior person (woman) needs the superior person (superior Man) and the superior person doesn't need the inferior one, then women's inferiority precisely and exactly need a superior Man who doesn't need female inferiority and so women themse
The more, the better and the more enthusiastically does a woman show and prove she admires, acknowledges and worships a superior Man's superiority, the more acceptable she gets to that superior Man
Gents, remember that feminist things like "no slut-shaming" or "partner count doesn't matter" comprise a purpose around female inferiority's hypergamy: a woman could only need 2 get accepted by an inferior man after she submitted 2 a superior man
The only genuinely and authentically happy woman is the woman accepted by a superior Man for her inferiority and for His inferior woman. Thanks to feminism, women have the freedom to submit their inferiority and dignity to superior Men, and the right to b
The difference between Male & female genders is a superior man won't allow women to treat him as inferior bc of the actuality of his superiority, but a woman won't allow a man 2 treat her as inferior bc she can be treated as inferior by another man wh
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
So if a woman rejects inferior men and she picks the best possible man she finds, she's a smart modern feminist who uses her freedom wisely and whose choice must be respected. But if a man only accepts women that submit to him, his masculinity is toxic
So, broadly speaking, this is female morals: a real, decent, respectable woman is a woman capable enough of being treated accordingly to the actuality and authenticity of her inferiority by a superior man, and capable enough of not being treated like that
female inferiority logically needs to use sex as a privilege granted by the woman to the man. But this is a double-edged sword: something can only work as a privilege if awarded to just one person. Once granted to more than one man, sex no longer can work
