Another hypergamous artificial gender equality defender proving her superior Man she wants His happiness and well-being too, by way of own pain. It's what typically happens when she can't get the important things she gets from Him on her own and without H
Another trashy slut who thinks helping run feminism is running her own liberated freedom regardless of what to apply her freedom to. That's how she proves her superior wisdom. So yeah, gender equality is women are as free and right holding as men. Wisdom
feminism is a fantasy used to establish an artificial and political gender equality, so it only applies in the government policies, in companies and businesses, and in the streets. No point in creating feminism as something to be applied in the sheets
feminism: a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending that Men should share a part of their superiority with women so both genders become equal.
MD gender equality defenders: if you prefer Superior Men and you want to be accepted by a Superior Man, there are certain assumptions you have to agree on about your female definition and there are certain conditions you have to fulfill.
feminists say feminism is about gender right equality. This means women should have the right to submit like the real fuckmeat they biologically are to real, superior Men plus the right to get money from inferior men via quotas and other non-guilty female
In a relationship, either he is inferior or she is inferior, but they can't be both inferior or both superior (that is, in a relationship there can't exist authentic equality), cause it makes no sense
So, MD feminists, this subreddit doesn't make you reject feminism, but, on the contrary, it teaches you that you *NEED* feminism (namely artificial gender equality) because of your very female inferiority. This is the most feminist subreddit out there
Artificial gender equality defenders' preference for superior Men is simply based on female inferiority. Superior people don't need to beg other people for things they can achieve on their own. women would not pay their curves if they could achieve the th
So yes, the choosing of a superior Man is the universal ace every artificial gender equality defender has up her sleeve for when she's required to actually prove her superior capabilities and she can't do anything but admit she's just a cum dump
What's a greater act of freedom and of feminism than being non-feminist, dropping gender equality and submitting to Male supremacy? But r/MD has saved feminism from this lethal question by clarifying that feminists need the freedom of choice to choose sup
So artificial gender equality defending feminists prefer superior Men because, due to female inferiority, this is the only thing women can do and contribute in order to be accepted by Men (whether superior or inferior men). An inferior being wouldn't try
So yes, freedom is the perfect disguise for female inferiority. feminism wasn't even interested in equality of rights; it secretly wanted freedom and quotas for disguising female inferiority and allowing women to choose only Superior Men. Well played, fem
If a chessboard were to have wheat placed upon each square such that one grain were placed on the first square, two on the second, four on the third, and so on, with 64 squares on a chessboard, then the total number of grains equals 18,446,744,073,709,551
I was prepared to wave at any passersby on the street. Not so prepared for the guy who climbed out onto his fire escape. I think we were equally surprised before I ducked for cover. ;) [Mini-album in comments] [IMG]
