"Come on, is all this shit serious?", the inferior man asks. Yeah, this subreddit is fantasy; everybody knows real life women prefer inferior men, cause their female superiority doesn't need superior Men
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
Superior Men don't need superior women, so they only accept inferior women. So, in order to get accepted by a superior Man, a woman has to affirm she's inferior. So you have this fact of feminists affirming inferior men women are superior, but reminding s
There are 2 possible claims a feminist can allege a Superior Man for being accepted by Him: a) Accept me cause I'm superior to you and I can help you; or b) Accept me cause I'm inferior to you and I need your help. Since this image doesn't seem to fit the
MD feminists: embrace your female biological inferiority; it's what makes you be recognized and desired as women by the superior Men you need and select. Also, if your Man has other wives as well as you in the house, you'll avoid boredom when performing y
A superior Man doesn't need to pay for sex or force women into sex against women's will, but women beg Him to mistreat them and accept them into one of His harems. feminism is a female methodology against inferior men for restraining inferior men and gett
MD feminists: if you are about to give a speech on feminism at the college and you need some help, remember that a superior man can give you some useful perspective
Every feminist needs to see covered and solved the question of getting accepted by a superior Man for her actual inferiority. Only then she'll show herself to the society as a conceited superior feminist that treats inferior men like the same shit she is
All honorable women manage to find good reasons and pretexts when it comes to justify their submission and self-humiliation to a Superior Man who doesn't need to ask for sex or force sex. female inferiority is not a flaw, but a virtue when it helps women
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
The truth of the assertion "women are inferior" is relative to context and conditional, this is why you can't say it that fast. If it is said by an inferior man, it is false; but if it is said by a superior Man, it is true.
women are so complete, that they can perform a task as easy as pleasuring a Man at the time they perform a task as superior as helping develop scientific theories. Here you have 2 women doing both things: pleasuring her Man, for Science's sake. So don't s
So women feel validationally happy when their physical pain and moral degradation succeed in amusing and getting enjoyed by a superior man. This is why women can validationally enjoy being mistreated as long as it is by a superior man
So female inferiority logically prefers a superior man; that is, women want a man they can boast about. & this subreddit is delving into the concept of marriage in order to develop it into a more perfect kind of marriage in which women can boast about
So women simply and logically are superior man-pursuing (& inferior man-hating) inferior fuckmeat. Since inferior men are inferior, they don't get pursued by women, but they're the ones pursuing women instead, which empowers women with worth, importan
Gents: the /r/MD version of women's definition "superior man-pursuing inferior fuckmeat" includes the "superior man-pursuing" clause as much as the "inferior fuckmeat" one. Pickiness (due to inferiority) defines women too, which is why women behave like p
Beauty and sexiness (that is, the superiority at/of inferiority) are female biological, evolutionary, genetic & survival expertise. Every feminist perfectly knows how to be sexy and beautiful to the superior man her female inferiority needs and prefer
When it comes 2 inferior men, feminism's core definition logically is gender equality (u can't call an inferior man a superior man). When it comes 2 superior men, feminism's core definit. is freedom of choice, comprising abilities such as choosing & s
A superior person never rejects an inferior person. A superior man would fuck every woman in the world if he could, and he'd never reject a woman into one of his harems. The only reason why a woman rejects a man is that she's inferior and there is another
Male superiority is the only attribute by means of which *not* treating women nicely becomes the way of seducing women. A woman is something an inferior man has to earn; a superior man is something a woman has to earn. It's not inconsiderateness that enab
If a woman doesn't want 2 have a sexual relationship with a man she's an independent woman that uses her freedom. But if a man doesn't want to have an economic-professional relationship with a woman he's a sexist and she'll report him so the authorities w
A superior man doesn't need to allow and won't allow any woman to address him in other terms than 'Sir' or 'Master' (as long as that woman wants to have the chance to interact with him). Inferior men might try the same, but women will laugh at them
So if a woman rejects inferior men and she picks the best possible man she finds, she's a smart modern feminist who uses her freedom wisely and whose choice must be respected. But if a man only accepts women that submit to him, his masculinity is toxic
The only immoral and indecent thing a woman can do is to submit to someone she doesn't need and she even hates, namely, an inferior man. female inferiority sees and feels dignity in sacrificing its dignity to superior men and only to them
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
