feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
women r open 2 polygyny, but only with superior Men. If a woman wants sex once in a month & a superior Man wants sex 30 times in a month, then if He has 30 wives they'll all live happy about sex. Polygyny is the most natural & stablest marriage. A
So women basically are superior man-seeking trash. So they are trash; & so, to superior men, there's no need to regard or pursue women as if they were something superior to trash. Although superior men are superior and so they don't need superior wome
women's studies says it's disrespect only if you do it without her consent. Turns out this implies it is not disrespect if you do it with her consent. So this axiom is the secret back door women's studies keeps for protecting equality defenders' preferenc
So feminists say if they go fully feminist and they choose not to shave their legs then men won't approach them. That's false. If feminists go fully feminist and they don't shave their legs then inferior men will approach them. The problem is those Male s
She never forgets what he told her: "if you don't want to lose me, you must be good with me". And she really loves him. He knows the secret of success with women isn't how you behave, if you are what women want.
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
MD feminists: if u want a man 4 a friend, not 4 sex, *treat him so he wants u 4 a friend, not 4 sex*. If u then get angry he's not interested in u sexually and u go promiscuous, he won't want u 4 sex since u have sex with others, and he won't want u 4 a f
MD feminists: embrace your female biological inferiority; it's what makes you be recognized and desired as women by the superior Men you need and select. Also, if your Man has other wives as well as you in the house, you'll avoid boredom when performing y
So, if you walk to a woman you don't know and you ask her for sex, she'll consider it degrading and disrespectful. she's not fooling you. women actually need sex to be degrading and disrespectful, because they need to degrade themselves and to submit thei
hypergamy isn't stupid, so feminists have their own win-win position concerning inferior men: if feminists have 2 b mistreated according 2 their inferiority, they'll only allow superior men 2 do it; but if they have 2 accept inferior men, they'll have 2 b
So if an inferior man refuses to have a relationship with a woman bc she doesn't wear makeup then he's oppressing her. But if a woman refuses to have a relationship with a man bc he's fat then he's oppressing her too. It's only feminism if it benefits the
MD feminists: r/MD is a Male2Male subreddit. So maybe your life gets happier if you simply unsubscribe this subreddit (if you se3e strange titles from myself it's due to whisky's effedcts)
The truth of the assertion "women are inferior" is relative to context and conditional, this is why you can't say it that fast. If it is said by an inferior man, it is false; but if it is said by a superior Man, it is true.
Gents, remember: if you let them walk all over you they'll say you're a nice feminist guy. If you simply adopt a behavior of not allowing them to walk over you but protecting yourself accordingly and legitimately, they'll say your masculinity is toxic. Th
MD feminists, remember: it's not mistreatment or degradation if you wanted and begged it to happen. Therefore it's not mistreatment or degradation if it is done to you by a superior man
MD feminists: u need feminism for getting respect, social status, affirmative action, presidencies and money from inferior men, but u need it too for pleasing superior men. To a superior man, it's sexier if the woman submitting to him is a feminist
So if a woman rejects inferior men and she picks the best possible man she finds, she's a smart modern feminist who uses her freedom wisely and whose choice must be respected. But if a man only accepts women that submit to him, his masculinity is toxic
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
So if feminists expect men to cultivate their superiority as much as possible, then it is fair that men expect women to cultivate their inferiority as much as possible. But if feminists want men to accept strong superior women, then feminists themselves s
hypergamy is women's self-defense: "if we have 2 b treated as inferior, we'll only choose superior men; but if we have 2 accept inferior men, we must b treated as superior". feminists aren't being treated as presidents, so expect a lot of female submissio
MD feminists, there is a simple lesson you should learn from all this Trump thing: things in this world aren't for free, if you want something, you have to earn it, so if you want feminism, you have to earn it
