women r open 2 polygyny, but only with superior Men. If a woman wants sex once in a month & a superior Man wants sex 30 times in a month, then if He has 30 wives they'll all live happy about sex. Polygyny is the most natural & stablest marriage. A
So real sex is women hurting, degrading, mistreating and destroying themselves to amuse and pleasure a superior Man. Real sex is women sacrificing and destroying the only thing their female inferiority can deny inferior men, their dignity and respectabili
So yes: not only do feminists admit their female gender's inferiority when this inferiority is an means of their own they can use to get accepted by a superior Man, but they even show off this inferiority as some skillful, qualifying and superior ability
Being superior is great. Given his superiority, a superior man wouldn't need any superior woman (if she existed), so he only accepts inferior women. So his is like a win-win position: either he feels no desire for a given woman, or she is a worthless piec
Superior Men don't need superior women, so they only accept inferior women. So, in order to get accepted by a superior Man, a woman has to affirm she's inferior. So you have this fact of feminists affirming inferior men women are superior, but reminding s
feminism is not against objectification; feminism is only against inferior men. Which is logical: feminism can't criticize the superiority of a Man who is actually superior.
The only existing "brainwashing Matrix" is the "Matrix" created by feminism for controlling inferior men. You will find no feminist married to an inferior man she has to maintain.
From a superior man's experienced perspective women are just inferior fuckmeat. From inferior men's perspective women could be known as fuckmeat too, only they're not acting like such; but inexperience makes inferior men discern that lack of female submis
The more, the better and the more enthusiastically does a woman show and prove she admires, acknowledges and worships a superior Man's superiority, the more acceptable she gets to that superior Man
Every feminist needs to see covered and solved the question of getting accepted by a superior Man for her actual inferiority. Only then she'll show herself to the society as a conceited superior feminist that treats inferior men like the same shit she is
So, once we have established a working definition of woman according to this subreddit (i.e., the "maledom definition" or "Superior Man's definition" of woman), as simple pieces of fuck-meat for a superior Man, women can decide better whether they subscri
Mistreating women doesn't make a Man superior; it's the fact that a Man is superior (namely, more visually handsome than the other men; brains or manners don't matter to the inferior female brain) that makes women submit to Him their female inferiority-ba
The only genuinely and authentically happy woman is the woman accepted by a superior Man for her inferiority and for His inferior woman. Thanks to feminism, women have the freedom to submit their inferiority and dignity to superior Men, and the right to b
The truth of the assertion "women are inferior" is relative to context and conditional, this is why you can't say it that fast. If it is said by an inferior man, it is false; but if it is said by a superior Man, it is true.
women are so complete, that they can perform a task as easy as pleasuring a Man at the time they perform a task as superior as helping develop scientific theories. Here you have 2 women doing both things: pleasuring her Man, for Science's sake. So don't s
So women feel validationally happy when their physical pain and moral degradation succeed in amusing and getting enjoyed by a superior man. This is why women can validationally enjoy being mistreated as long as it is by a superior man
So female inferiority logically prefers a superior man; that is, women want a man they can boast about. & this subreddit is delving into the concept of marriage in order to develop it into a more perfect kind of marriage in which women can boast about
So women simply and logically are superior man-pursuing (& inferior man-hating) inferior fuckmeat. Since inferior men are inferior, they don't get pursued by women, but they're the ones pursuing women instead, which empowers women with worth, importan
Gents: the /r/MD version of women's definition "superior man-pursuing inferior fuckmeat" includes the "superior man-pursuing" clause as much as the "inferior fuckmeat" one. Pickiness (due to inferiority) defines women too, which is why women behave like p
When it comes 2 inferior men, feminism's core definition logically is gender equality (u can't call an inferior man a superior man). When it comes 2 superior men, feminism's core definit. is freedom of choice, comprising abilities such as choosing & s
feminists only want to be mistreated by superior men and so to prevent inferior men from mistreating them. When women refuse to submit, it's not because it's indecent or immoral, but because the man they're supposed to submit to isn't superior
If a woman doesn't want 2 have a sexual relationship with a man she's an independent woman that uses her freedom. But if a man doesn't want to have an economic-professional relationship with a woman he's a sexist and she'll report him so the authorities w
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
The inferior female mind gets existentially defined by its deep secret need, love & desire for superior men, and its deep secret hate for inferior men. But no man should ever blame women for hypergamy, bc no man would ever want a daughter of his to ma
