Is there a better way to relax after a hard day at work? Yes. She didn't bring him a drink to enjoy while she services him. She'll pay for that... But not right now.
This female was feeling confident that she could deepthroat the superior male by herself. This was swiftly handled by the male who then trained her himself. She was then brought back to her inferior state when the male discharged his secretion on her face
So should her former sexual partner count matter? We're bringing r/MD's principle on this again: to a superior man, the only thing she can do for her former sexual partner count to not matter is that she degrades herself for that new superior man more tha
So here you have another wise sex-positive feminist, who liberatedly chose the sex profession because she loves feminist sex. She proudly shows off she's skilled enough for being so inferior, that she's superior from the viewpoint of her inferiority.
In rich countries of freedom, of professional opportunities and of feminism, she makes money that way either because she is inferior or because she is empowered; choose your favorite interpretation.
He is not forcing her; that's happening because she wants. She's free to leave him and go, if she considers she's more than that and she's self-sufficient enough to live on her own, without his help. That spit means: "you are just an inferior piece of fle
Every feminist needs to see covered and solved the question of getting accepted by a superior Man for her actual inferiority. Only then she'll show herself to the society as a conceited superior feminist that treats inferior men like the same shit she is
Gents, remember that feminist things like "no slut-shaming" or "partner count doesn't matter" comprise a purpose around female inferiority's hypergamy: a woman could only need 2 get accepted by an inferior man after she submitted 2 a superior man
Gents: whether a woman won't want to have sex with you at all, she'll give you a little sex but on the condition that she can have sex with other men too, or she'll only want to have ALL the sex with you, mustn't depend on what you tell her to do, but on
So if a woman rejects inferior men and she picks the best possible man she finds, she's a smart modern feminist who uses her freedom wisely and whose choice must be respected. But if a man only accepts women that submit to him, his masculinity is toxic
Gents: when u r superior, she wants 2 b accepted & taken by u (as well as she wants u). No woman is interested in being accepted by an inferior man. It's the inferior one that needs the superior; it's the inferior that loves & needs 2 b loved. No
feminism isn't about not rejecting a female candidate 4 a given job on the basis that she is a woman but that she's inferior 2 a male candidate; feminism is about picking a female candidate 4 a job even if she's inferior, just because she's a woman. That'
She's in heels but she's standing flat footed. Could you fucking imagine that deadly ass raised by the heels? My dick would need to go to the hospital!