women don't tell inferior men they aren't inferior meat bc they aren't, but bc women submit their inferiority 2 superior men as their best choice: if women submitted 2 inf. men too, they'd have no way of getting accepted by sup. men. female denial 2 inf.
So feminism has 2 cores incompatible to each other: 1-equality, the definitional core, which feminists use for getting social status, quotas and money from inferior men; 2-freedom of choice, i.e the possibility of getting out of equality, to submit to sup
What's a greater act of freedom and of feminism than being non-feminist, dropping gender equality and submitting to Male supremacy? But r/MD has saved feminism from this lethal question by clarifying that feminists need the freedom of choice to choose sup
