"Come on, is all this shit serious?", the inferior man asks. Yeah, this subreddit is fantasy; everybody knows real life women prefer inferior men, cause their female superiority doesn't need superior Men
Feminists only dislike being treated as inferior beings by men who are inferior too. Feminists don't dislike male superiority; they dislike fake, pretended male superiority.
feminism is utterly erratic: it defends gender-equality, but it defends female freedom too; what if a woman freely prefers a Superior Man?. I know real life women normally prefer inferior men, but what if a woman freely chooses a Superior Man?.
Yes: the end justifies the means too. So if a woman's end is a superior Man, then her means must be to submit to Him as inferior fuckmeat. And every real life woman prefers a superior Man as her optimal choice, that is, as the optimal choice of her inferi
women r open 2 polygyny, but only with superior Men. If a woman wants sex once in a month & a superior Man wants sex 30 times in a month, then if He has 30 wives they'll all live happy about sex. Polygyny is the most natural & stablest marriage. A
Do you know why do feminists prefer to live with superior Men that will consider them and treat them as inferior, over living as superior women with inferior men or on their own? Because that's their best choice given their actual female inferiority
MD feminists: behaving according to your female inferiority becomes your most superior and least objectionable conduct when you do it for a Man that is superior
All equality defenders prefer a Superior Man. So how do you get feminists destroying feminism? Let their inferior brains understand feminism is incompatible with a preference for Superior Men and they have to choose, and then see what their choice is.
So should her former sexual partner count matter? We're bringing r/MD's principle on this again: to a superior man, the only thing she can do for her former sexual partner count to not matter is that she degrades herself for that new superior man more tha
No matter how inferior and incapable a woman is: every woman has a body, and this body can feel pain. The female free-but-optimizing genetic agency optimizingly delivers its inferior body to the most superior Man. Submitting to a superior Man makes women
MD Gentlemen: it's not women gifting you their inferiority; it's you gifting women your superiority. A Superior Man doesn't have to convince women to have sex with Him; women have to convince Him to have sex with them.
Here we aren't interested in the false image of female superiority feminists brainwash inferior men about at feminist meetings to get money from those men. We're interested in the actual women, that go back home to a superior Man whose love they want to k
Inferiority is linked to need. Inferior women need Superior Men. women need Superior Men because women are inferior. You won't see many women preferring inferior men. Men, however, prefer inferior women.
After all, a woman can be good, superior, at making something as inferior and easy as a sandwich, or at giving a blowjob. This is female "superiority", and women will only use these "best" assets of theirs to achieve their most important goals: the "best"
So yes: not only do feminists admit their female gender's inferiority when this inferiority is an means of their own they can use to get accepted by a superior Man, but they even show off this inferiority as some skillful, qualifying and superior ability
women's life consists in 2 activities: 1º) performing their inferiority reality-play in order to get accepted by the superior Men female inferiority prefers; and 2º) performing their superiority feminist role-play to dodge sex with inferior men and get re
There are 2 possible claims a feminist can allege a Superior Man for being accepted by Him: a) Accept me cause I'm superior to you and I can help you; or b) Accept me cause I'm inferior to you and I need your help. Since this image doesn't seem to fit the
What is less than a doormat or a urinal to a superior Man, is a haughty, superior female figure to those inferior men that crawl to her. That's how inferior and worthless inferior men are to women
So the person who loves loves the loved person's marvelous & superior qualities, so it's the inferior that loves the superior, and the unidirectionality of love is determined by the inferiority and superiority of the parties. The inferior loves the su
MD feminists: embrace your inferiority. Gender "inferiority/superiority" mustn't be understood as "bad/good", but as "female/Male", so your inferiority makes your femaleness superior. Embracing your inferiority gets u superior Men. U don't dislike being i
The more, the better and the more enthusiastically does a woman show and prove she admires, acknowledges and worships a superior Man's superiority, the more acceptable she gets to that superior Man
Since superior Men won't be interested in her for her inner virtues, she'll have to interest those Men by means of her body. Yes, she'll have to do this, since otherwise she'll have to live on her own, without any superior Man, like a superior woman
Inferiority & superiority are relative: for an inferior person to exist, there needs to exist a superior person too. This is why the fact that women are just inferior human garbage to superior men does NOT make women inferior human garbage in an absol
So: 1-A logical link exists between female inferiority and female preference for superior men; 2-This combined fact of female inferiority's preference for superior men holds a position definitional to female nature: women are just superior man-pursuing in
In order not to be treated as inferior by a woman, a superior man will show his superiority. In order not to be treated as inferior by a man, a woman will choose to be treated as inferior by another different man (superior to the former). A woman's superi
Given superior men don't need superior women & so they only accept inferior women, 2 superior men female carnal attributes aren't sexy per se (boobs are just boobs & women show them at the gynecologist's office), but only as long as women offer th
In other words: it's not degrading if a woman is treated like an inferior person by a superior man, because he's precisely superior and she's inferior. And it's not degrading if a woman is treated like a superior person by an inferior man, logically. So w
All men want 2 b superior but it's logically impossible. If all men virtually had equal superiority, female inferiority would still look 4 small differences among men 2 find the most superior man, bc the very definition of femaleness relies on female infe
To women, being superior men's fuckmeat and inferior men's presidents aren't incompatible goals, given superior men's superiority & minority and inferior men's inferiority & majority. Soon a male president's wife will show u what the triumph of hy
women try to seduce superior men by implying other men are inferior to those superior men. women try to get respect, social status, quotas, affirmative action, presidencies, money and feminism from inferior men by implying other men are superior to those
