The definition of "woman" can be considered from two different but equivalent perspectives: A) what women say to superior Men they are; and B) what women say to inferior men they aren't
Only superior men logically know first-hand the actuality of women's inferiority. To women inferior men are like "social noise" women try to get useful things from (such as status, quotas, presidencies or money) via the institutionalisation of hypergamy a
Thanks to the freedom feminism has brought to women, she can get her asshole destroyed and still say it's empowering, pleasurable and she loves sex. Because, in the end, what is a greater act of freedom than choosing what is worst for you? That free are w
Women have dignity and respectability, who says they don't. It's only that their dignity and respectability are relative, flexible, depending on whether she's interested in him or not. Probably a survival strategy.
She never forgets what he told her: "if you don't want to lose me, you must be good with me". And she really loves him. He knows the secret of success with women isn't how you behave, if you are what women want.
The feminist brainwash helps women get rid of inferior men. The Maledom brainwash helps women be accepted by the superior Men they need and prefer. So both brainwashes are not incompatible, but they complement each other
What is less than a doormat or a urinal to a superior Man, is a haughty, superior female figure to those inferior men that crawl to her. That's how inferior and worthless inferior men are to women
Only superior Men are good and worth enough for demanding and making their acceptance conditional on women's greatest and best efforts and qualities. Only superior Men know the reality of women.
women have always preferred the best, most superior Male genes, to the species' benefit. Only that different internet's sources, among which this humble little known subreddit is, are helping future female generations gain a greater awareness about it
women like being natural, so superior Men treat them like the inferior fuck-meat they naturally are. women only like being artificial when they demand artificial gender equality to inferior men
women aren't inferior and unworthy because they perform inferior and unworthy jobs; they perform inferior and unworthy jobs because they are inferior and unworthy.
Who says women don't like sex? women love sex, but only with superior Men. The reason is blows are painful when they're given by inferior men, but they turn pleasurable when they're given by superior Men. Yes, female sexuality is more... complex
feminists say feminism is about gender right equality. This means women should have the right to submit like the real fuckmeat they biologically are to real, superior Men plus the right to get money from inferior men via quotas and other non-guilty female
To a superior Man women simply are these pathetic worthless human-like cumdumps. To inferior men that is absolutely degrading, disrespectful, unacceptable and simply unreal, which is what women want inferior men to think by means of feminism. But superior
So women can be simply defined as superior man pursuing inferior fuck meat. Inferior men are incapacitated for apprehending the authentic extent of the accuracy of that definition by their very inferiority and the lack of experience caused by that inferio
The only way women can get accepted by superior Men is to self-degrade to worthless inferior fuckmeat; but the fact that women actually are worthless inferior fuckmeat is what makes them prefer superior Men, and prefer and be incapable to submit anything
What is a woman, but the set of her abilities? Guess what? Yeah, women only apply their actual definition to Superior Men; Superior Men know well what women actually are.
So women try to gain superior men's appreciation and genes by showing them how good they are at submitting (that is, how superior they are at being inferior). women try to gain inferior men's appreciation and money by showing them how good they are at not
After all, if female inferiority prefers and picks superior men, why would women need inferior men who are feminist and believe in female superiority? Considering inferior men are in the majority and democracy relies on the majority, take your guess
Dignity, that is, the fact of not being treated as inferior by somebody else oneself is not inferior to, is something female inferiority can logically have only concerning men that are inferior too. & this is why women see their submission to superior
The media are getting it wrong; the main concern here isn't the rise of new thoughts on masculinity, but the new status of the awareness of women attempting to get from inferior men the femini$m they should b demanding from the superior men their female i
In poor countries women prostitute themselves to earn money; they are unwilling, false, bad whores. In First World's countries of wealth, of freedom, of professional choices and of feminism women earn money to prostitute themselves; they're willing, good,
So feminism just tries to make the society acknowledge the logical truth of the idea that women's right not to be treated like inferior people by men that are inferior too can't get obstructed by women's right to be treated like inferior people by superio
female hypergamy perfectly knows that authentic male superiority is a minority feature and so male inferiority is the majority feature and democracy relies on majorities, so never underestimate female hypergamy: men are women's work field just like the na
So women's necessity of being treated respectfully and like presidents by inferior men (that is, feminism) is logical to female inferiority's necessity of being accepted as inferior and in its inferiority by the superior men that are that female inferiori
You will never hear any of those male supremacy fighting feminists say she prefers men that aren't superior to herself. However, superior men prefer women that are just inferior fuck meat. Superiority is superiority; inferiority is inferiority
Honor has to do with not being mistreated or treated as inferior by people who are equal to oneself. This is why, to women, being mistreated by inferior men is dishonorable, but being capable of being mistreated by superior men is a kind of "female honora
The fact that female inferiority wants to be treated like shit by superior men makes inferior men believe they can treat women like shit too, but inferior men are inferior too and so they're shit too, which is why women need feminism against inferior men
Misogyny doesn't really need to be the problem: women could simply prefer and choose inferior men who actually believe in female superiority, who are feminist and who are not misogynistic. But real life women don't prefer inferior men, cause such is the l
